| Title: | Foreign Currency Hedges: Offsetting a Subsidiary's Exposure on a Net Basis in Which Neither Leg of the Third-Party Position Is in the Treasury Center's Functional Currency |
| Paragraph references: | 40A, 40B |
| Date cleared by Board: | March 21, 2001 |
| Date posted to website: | April 10, 2001 |
QUESTION
In instances in which a qualifying foreign currency cash flow hedging relationship exists based on paragraph 40A(b)(2) of Statement 133 and the exposures arising from multiple internal derivative contracts are aggregated or netted for each foreign currency, could the treasury center enter into a third-party position with neither leg of the third-party position being the Treasury Center's functional currency to offset its exposure.
BACKGROUND
Paragraph 40B of Statement 133 permits a Treasury Center to offset exposure arising from multiple internal derivative contracts on an aggregate or net basis if the following conditions are met:
RESPONSE
Yes. In a qualifying foreign currency cash flow hedge that exists based on paragraph 40A(b)(2) and in which the exposures arising from multiple internal derivative contracts are aggregated or netted for each foreign currency, the Treasury Center could enter into a third-party position with neither leg of the third-party position being the Treasury Center's functional currency to offset its exposure provided that the amount of the respective currencies of each leg are equivalent with respect to each other based on forward exchange rates. Paragraph 40B requires that the derivative contract(s) with the unrelated third party provides offset for each foreign currency exposure and that the gains and losses generated from the third-party derivative contract(s) generates equal or approximating gains or losses generated by the internal derivatives entered into between the subsidiaries and the Treasury Center. For example, if a US Dollar functional currency Treasury Center was short 390 Euros and long 40,684.80 Yen after netting its exposures obtained from internal derivative contracts and the forward exchange rate between Euros and Yen was 1.00 Euro = 104.32 Yen, then the Treasury Center could enter into a third-party receive 390 Euros/pay 40,684.80 Yen contract to offset the exposures. In contrast, if the Treasury Center was short 390 Euros and long 51,000 Yen, then the Treasury Center would need to enter into 2 third-party contracts with the receive leg of the second third-party position being the Treasury Center's functional currency. For example, the Treasury Center could enter into a third-party receive 390 Euros/pay 40,684.80 Yen contract to offset the Euro exposure and partially offset the Yen exposure. It would then need to enter into a receive functional currency/pay Yen contract to hedge the remainder of its Yen exposure.
The above response has been authored by the FASB staff and represents the staff's views, although the Board has discussed the above response at a public meeting and chosen not to object to dissemination of that response. Official positions of the FASB are determined only after extensive due process and deliberation.