The staff has prepared this summary of Board decisions for information purposes only. Those Board decisions are tentative and do not change current accounting. Official positions of the FASB are determined only after extensive due process and deliberations.
Project Objective
*Decisions Reached at the Last Meeting
Summary of Decisions Reached
*Next Steps
*Board Meeting and Public Meeting Dates
Related FASB Articles
Background Information
Contact Information
Project Objective
The objective of the Income Tax project is to improve the accounting for income taxes, while reducing the existing differences between the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740 on income taxes (FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ), and IAS 12, Income Taxes. Although Topic 740 and IAS 12 are based on similar principles, there are certain differences in the application of those similar principles that result in noncomparability of financial information reported internationally. The FASB and the IASB (Boards) are jointly deliberating the issues in this project.
*Decisions Reached at the Last Meeting (October 28, 2009)
The IASB staff presented an analysis of the comment letters received on its Exposure Draft, Income Tax. The Boards indicated that they would consider undertaking a fundamental review of accounting for income taxes at some time in the future. In the meantime, the IASB staff plans to present options on how the IASB should proceed with the proposals in the Exposure Draft at the November IASB meeting.
Summary of Decisions Reached
Scope and Scope Exceptions
The income tax project will consider the following exceptions to the comprehensive deferred tax asset and liability recognition principle of Topic 740:
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (codified primarily as paragraphs 740-10-25-6 through 25-17 and 740-10-30-7). The objective of that Interpretation is to clarify accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with Topic 740. Paragraphs 740-10-25-6 through 25-17 apply a recognition threshold to tax uncertainties, and paragraph 740-10-30-7 requires that deductions that meet the recognition threshold be measured at a single point best estimate. The IASB has tentatively decided to amend IAS 12 to clarify accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The IASB’s tentative decision would require entities to measure the current and deferred tax consequences of uncertainties related to tax positions based on the expected outcome (the probability weighted average of the possible outcomes).
The income tax project will not consider the following:
These items may be considered in a current or future agenda project that is more closely associated with these differences
Recognition
The Board addressed the following topics regarding the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Unremitted Earnings of Foreign Subsidiaries and Corporate Joint Ventures.
Due to the practical complexities of calculating the amount of deferred taxes for the unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures, the Boards decided to retain the exceptions in Topic 740 and IAS 12 for the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for certain investments in foreign subsidiaries (or foreign corporate joint ventures). The IASB tentatively decided to amend the language in IAS 12 to make it similar to that in Topic 740 with respect to unremitted foreign earnings. The Boards also requested that the staff evaluate whether improvements could be made to the disclosure requirements for unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures.
The Boards received three unsolicited comment letters on the exceptions for foreign unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint ventures.
Intra-Entity Transfers and Foreign Currency Translation
The Board decided to eliminate the following two exceptions to the comprehensive recognition of deferred taxes in paragraph 740-10-25-3 (paragraph 9 of Statement 109):
The Boards received one unsolicited comment letter concerning intra-entity transfers and foreign currency exceptions.
Acquired Temporary Differences in Asset Acquisitions (paragraphs 740-10-25-50 through 25-55; EITF Issue No. 98-11, "Accounting for Acquired Temporary Differences in Certain Purchase Transactions That Are Not Accounted for as Business Combinations")
The Board decided that acquired temporary differences in asset acquisitions other than a business combination should be accounted for as follows:
Business Combinations
The Board decided to retain the guidance in Subtopic 805-740 on income taxes for business combinations by continuing to prohibit the recognition of a deferred tax liability for the portion of goodwill for which amortization is not deductible for tax purposes.
Change in Tax Status
The Board decided to amend paragraph 740-10-45-19 (paragraph 28 of Statement 109) to explicitly include the current tax consequences of an entity’s change in tax status. This change would be consistent with guidance provided in SIC Interpretation 25, Income Taxes—Changes in the Tax Status of an Entity or its Shareholders. The proposed change is not intended to change current practice.
Initial and Subsequent Measurement
The Board addressed the following topics regarding the measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Different Rate Depending on Whether an Entity Distributes Earnings to Owners
In certain jurisdictions, an entity’s taxable income is taxed at different rates, depending on whether income is distributed to owners or retained by the entity. In other jurisdictions, an entity is provided a deduction from taxable income for dividends paid to owners. In these situations, the Board decided to require an entity to use the distributed rate to measure tax assets or liabilities i f the entity expects to distribute income to owners and has the ability to do so. In all other cases, entities are required to use the undistributed rate. The existing guidance on this subject is in paragraphs 740-10-25-39 through 25-41 and 740-10-30-14 through 30-15 (EITF Issues No. 95-10, “Accounting for Tax Credits Related to Dividend Payments in Accordance with FASB Statements No. 109” and No. 95-20, “Measurement in the Consolidated Financial Statements of a Parent of the Tax Effects Related to the Operations of a Foreign Subsidiary That Receives Tax Credits Related to Dividend Payments”).
Change in Tax Law or Rate
For operations within U.S. taxing jurisdictions, the Board decided to retain the guidance in Topic 740 that requires entities to recognize the effect of the change in tax laws or rates in the period of enactment. For operations other than U.S. taxing jurisdictions, the Board decided to amend Topic 740 to require the use of an approach that is consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The IFRS approach requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be measured based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted (or substantively enacted) by the balance sheet date.
Definition of Tax Basis
The Board decided to include a definition of the term tax basis in the master glossary. The definition would be based on the tentative definition that the IASB adopted, with some modification. The definition is not intended to change current practice.
Realizability of Deferred Taxes
The Board decided to retain terminology currently contained in Topic 740 about the realizability of deferred tax assets. The IASB tentatively decided to amend IAS 12 to converge to the valuation allowance approach within Topic 740 but plans to use different terms to describe that approach than those in Topic 740. The FASB decided not to amend the terminology in Topic 740 to converge with the proposed changes to IAS 12. The Board reiterated that, with the proposed changes to IAS 12, the revised IAS 12 and Topic 740 would both use the same approach to assess the realizability of deferred tax assets.
Presentation and Disclosure
Intraperiod Tax Allocation
The Boards decided the following:
Disclosure
The Board considered certain differences between the disclosure requirements in Topic 740 and IAS 12 and decided to amend the disclosure requirements in Topic 740 as follows:
The Board decided not to require additional disclosures about the nature and amount of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
Transition and Effective Date
The Board tentatively decided the following:
*Next Steps
The FASB has suspended its deliberations on the Income Taxes project. The Boards will consider undertaking a fundamental review of accounting for income taxes at some time in the future. In the meantime, the IASB staff plans to present options on how the IASB should proceed with the proposals in its Exposure Draft, Income Tax, at the November 2009 IASB meeting.
*Board Meeting and Public Meeting Dates
The Board meeting minutes are provided for the information and convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board meetings. Decisions become final only after a formal written ballot to issue a final standard.
Below is a list of the FASB Board meetings over the history of the project. Minutes for meetings generally are posted within two weeks following the meeting. Refer to the IASB website for IASB Board meetings.
| October 28, 2009 | Joint Board Meeting—IASB analysis of comment letters. Administrative plans. |
| December 5, 2007 | Board Meeting—Sweep Issues, Distributed vs. Undistributed Tax Rates, Transition and Effective Date |
| January 31, 2007 | Board Meeting—Assets acquired with temporary differences and non-deductible goodwill |
| October 24, 2005 | Board Meeting—Distributed vs. Undistributed Tax Rates |
| June 15, 2005 | Board Meeting—Disclosures |
| April 21, 2005 | Joint Board Meeting—Intraperiod Tax Allocation |
| March 23, 2005 | Board Meeting—Recognition and Measurement of Deferred Taxes |
| January 19, 2005 | Board Meeting—Recognition and Measurement of Deferred Taxes |
| December 15, 2004 | Board Meeting—Intra-entity Transfers and Foreign Currency Exceptions |
| October 20, 2004 | Joint Board Meeting—Foreign Unremitted Earnings Exceptions |
| September 23, 2004 | FASAC Meeting Handout |
| July 27, 2004 | Board Meeting—Opinion 23 and Steamship Entity Exceptions |
| April 22, 2004 | Joint Board Meeting—Discussion of Acquired Temporary Differences in Asset Acquisitions (Issue 98-11) |
| March 16, 2004 | Board Meeting—Discussion of Scope and Initial Project Activities |
Related FASB Articles
"Developing Consistent Application of Similar Principles of Accounting for Income Taxes," The FASB Report, No. 257, June 30, 2004.
Background Information
Topic 740 and IAS 12 are founded on similar principles: both take a balance sheet approach to accounting for income taxes. Both account for (1) taxes currently payable (or receivable) arising from current taxable income and (2) future (deferred) taxes payable (or receivable) due to differences in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) (or IFRS) and tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS principally arise for the following reasons:
Both Topic 740 and IAS 12 make certain explicit exceptions to the basic principle, and those exceptions are the primary source of the divergence. Topic 740 has six explicit exceptions to the basic principle and IAS 12 has three explicit exceptions to the basic principle. There is some overlap in these exceptions. Some exceptions involve country-specific issues (for example, the exception related to U.S. steamship entity statutory reserve funds or bad-debt reserves of U.S. savings and loan associations) that do not represent a fundamental difference in the overall approach. Due to the passage of time or issuance of new authoritative literature, some of the historical exceptions may have been obviated.
Additionally, there are subtle but substantive differences between Topic 740 and IAS 12 related to the recognition and measurement of tax assets and liabilities that may create differences in their application. These differences relate to tax rates (for example, distributed versus undistributed, and enacted versus substantively enacted) and deferred tax asset recognition (thresholds for recognition and approach to valuation allowances—for example, impairment versus affirmative judgment).
Finally, as a result of subsequently issued implementation guidance, there are differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS that are not solely the result of differences between IAS 12 and legacy Statement 109 as it was originally issued (for example, initial recognition of deferred tax effects in certain asset acquisitions in accordance with Issue 98-11).
For these reasons, the FASB identified income taxes as a topic for convergence. The FASB and IASB are sharing staff resources and research and coordinating activities on the project. The Boards deliberate individually and vote on each issue. Details on the IASB’s decisions to date are available on its website at www.iasb.org.
Contact Information
Peter Proestakes
Assistant Technical Director
pcproestakes@fasb.org